"The seal ban is hurting the indigious people because 'The white man' did not bother to think this time either."
EUROPEAN FUR AUCTION HOUSES HAVE EXPORTED FUR FOR AN
APPROXIMATE VALUE OF 1.5 BILLION EUROS THIS SEASON: SHOULD EUROPE
BE PROUD OR ASHAMED OF THIS?
I am trying not to see things in black and white. Almost all kind
of industries have things that they can be proud or ashamed of. The
fur production is an important sector for several regions in
Europe, especially rural ones where the production create jobs,
business opportunities, revenues and taxes.
SINCE THE DISCUSSION ON THE SEAL BAN STARTED IN 2006,
EXPORT OF SEAL SKINS IN GREENLAND HAS DROPPED FROM 8 MILLION EUROS
TO BELOW 1 MILLION EUROS. IN YOUR VIEW, DOES THIS IMPLY THAT THE
INUIT EXEMPTION DOES NOT WORK?
The seal ban is hurting the indigious people because 'The white
man' did not bother to think this time either. People have hunted
seals for hundreds and hundreds of years. I cannot see how seal
hunt differs from other types of hunting in areas where you have a
population which for centuries have been depending on a certain
craft.
IN YOUR VIEW, WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ARGUMENT AGAINST
THE PRODUCTION OF FUR?
If animals are not treated well. Fur products must meet animal
welfare standards. That is not the case all over the world, but in
Europe the situation is generally good. However, it is important
that inspections make that the standards are always followed.
Besides, I do not find rational arguments against fur production by
good standards.
IN YOUR VIEW, WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ARGUMENT IN
FAVOUR OF FUR PRODUCTION?
It creates jobs and business opportunities in many rural areas in
Europe. If you would be living in Lappland, you would be dependent
on ecologically sound clothing. I think we have more serious
incidents due to bad clothing than to fur.
DO YOU THINK THAT THE EU SHOULD URGE THIRD COUNTRIES TO
RESPECT ANIMAL WELFARE PRINCIPLES WHEN EXPORTING GOODS TO THE EU
MARKET?
Yes.
EUROPEAN FUR PRODUCTION HAS GROWN BY 19% SINCE 2005 - IS
THAT A GOOD THING?
Sustainable production that creates more jobs, revenues and taxes
is always a good thing. I don't see why fur should be
different.
IN YOUR VIEW, IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BREEDING
ANIMALS FOR THEIR FUR AND BREEDING ANIMALS FOR THEIR
MEAT?
Well, we need food and we need clothes. The crucial question is
how we produce what we need.
DO YOU BELIEVE THAT FUR FARMING COULD REPRESENT AN
INTERESTING OPTION TO FOSTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL
AREAS?
It is definitely already like this today. Fur production is a very
important sector in many regional rural areas in several European
countries, where you wouldn't find other opportunities.